Hi Yeah the documentation is a goal for Camel 3. All the component documentation will be able in the future to be auto updated and kept in sync from the source code, based on all the recent work we have done to annotate and include the docs in the build.
And we would also be able to generate per version docs etc. Though today in the wiki then yeah we have those Camel 2.4 etc labels to indicate when the option was added. There are still users that use Camel 2.10 etc so as you say we should keep X versions back at least. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > as I'm quite new to Camel I read a lot of documentation. > > Thanks for providing it, most of it is very helpful. :) > > I was wondering if the "available as of version" mentions for very old > versions should be removed? For example http://camel.apache.org/cache.html > mentions that camel cache is "Available as of Camel 2.1" and "|GET| and > |CHECK| requires *Camel 2.3* onwards.". There is also a section on "Header > changes in Camel 2.8". > > Of course it's not critical and even interesting from a historic > perspective, but it also clutters a bit and could make the documentation > seem out of date. What do you think? > > -Pascal -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
