I see no reason to change the logging implementation for tests.  If it
ain't broke, don't fix it.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:00 AM James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
wrote:

> +1, I'd rather use some form of a facade (homegrown, slf4j, etc.)
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:55 AM Vitalii Tymchyshyn <v...@tym.im> wrote:
>
>> Well, best practice is to use a logging facade like slf4j and not some
>> logging implementation, like logback or log4j.
>>
>> P.S. I will be grateful if someone tell me if this message can be seen
>>
>> Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
>>
>> Вт, 2 серп. 2016 08:53 користувач Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>> пише:
>>
>> > Oh and if any migration is needed, then maybe logback is an
>> > alternative than log4j v2?
>> > http://logback.qos.ch
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Luca Burgazzoli <
>> lburgazz...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to
>> log4j
>> > 2 ?
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > We only use it for testing. No runtime dependency.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > log4j v2 did not support log4j.properties file so any migration was a
>> > > real pain as the log4j xml file format is verbose and clunky to work
>> > > with.
>> > >
>> > > Only recently they added support for .properties file but I think they
>> > > may have changed the syntax slightly (not sure).
>> > >
>> >
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22485074/log4j-2-doesnt-support-log4j-properties-file-anymore
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > And I think I read somewhere that log4j v1 has problems with Java 9.
>> > >
>> > > If migration can be super easy on current 2.18 then it is okay.
>> > > Some kind of migration tool that can covert v1 properties to v2
>> > > properties then that can be doable.
>> > >
>> > > But if not then I would like to postpone this to Camel 3.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> Luca Burgazzoli
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Claus Ibsen
>> > > -----------------
>> > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Claus Ibsen
>> > -----------------
>> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to