On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazz...@gmail.com> wrote: > I know, that was also my concern. > > However I think that to highlight how nicely camel plays with other > tecnologies we should rely on a better landing page rather than the > repository layout. >
Yeah sure that is part of the effort to do a new website and documentation as well. But its a long tough work to get there. Its okay to move the starters to platforms/spring-boot/component-starters. Mind there is some work to do besides the move, to adjust various maven tooling that rely on the current directory location, which would need to be adjusted. Also for camel-catalog that gathers which SB starters we have. > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 20:00, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As long the artifactId is not change then its okay to move where the >> >> source code is. >> >> >> >> SB is so popular and having components-starter in the root highlights >> >> that Camel has great SB support. >> >> >> >> So its both good and bad. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazz...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello everyone, >> >> > >> >> > as components-starter is platform specific (spring-boot), would it >> >> > make sense to move it to platforms/spring-boot ? >> >> > >> >> > --- >> >> > Luca Burgazzoli >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Claus Ibsen >> >> ----------------- >> >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >> >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >> >> -- > -- > Luca Burgazzoli -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
