+1 as well. Regards JB
On Dec 19, 2017, 19:34, at 19:34, Francois Papon <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >As a Camel user, I agree about rename this component without version >number because actually we have to change camel route endpoint to >upgrade ES component. > >+1 > >François > > >Le 19/12/2017 à 19:30, Zoran Regvart a écrit : >> Sounds very reasonable to me we should name it so it doesn't look >outdated. >> >> We already had a couple of component renames in 2.20 (CAMEL-11242 and >> CAMEL-11575 come to mind) and there hasn't been any uproar from the >> community. >> >> So +1 >> >> zoran >> >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andrea Cosentino >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Currently we have two components: Elasticsearch5 that will be >deprecated and Elasticsearch5Rest that will be the main component, >since it will use the ES rest client, suggested from Elasticsearch >community. >>> ES 6 is already released and we have also the bundles for that. >>> Do we need to change the name of Elasticsearch5Rest to >ElasticsearchRest and upgrade to 6.x? >>> I believe this is something we should try to accomplish before >2.21.0 release. >>> Thanks. >>> --Andrea Cosentino ----------------------------------Apache Camel >PMC MemberApache Karaf CommitterApache Servicemix PMC MemberEmail: >[email protected]: @oscerd2Github: oscerd >> >>
