Hi Guillaume,

The endpoint-dsl is really helpful for camel to verify the endpoint
setting in the compile time.
Now I just have a quick question about how does the camel runtime
detect the dependencies of camel route?
With the endpoint URI we could use the camel-catalog do this kind of
work, with the endpoint-dsl we need to figure out another way to do
it.



Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:37 AM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Le mar. 11 juin 2019 à 20:45, Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > Hey Guillaume, nice feature indeed.
> > Just a detail when reading the example, I think one could be surprised to
> > have x2 from/to at first glance, I mean:
> > from(fromFile(... and to(toFile(...
> >
> >
> I do agree.  My original idea was to only use file(xxx), but one constraint
> is to have a different type for consumers and producers because they have
> different options, so we can't use the same method name.  So the current
> design is a fallback because I haven't found anything better, but I'm open
> to suggestions ...
>
>
>
> > My 2 cents,
> > Alex
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:39 PM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I think I'm done with a first usable pass at the endpoint DSL.
> > > I've removed the getters/setters, added 2 flavors of fluent methods (one
> > > with the real java type, another one with a String to allow references
> > and
> > > property placeholder processing), renamed the generated classes to
> > > XxxEndpointBuilder and cleaned things a bit.
> > > In order to access this API, one would create an EndpointRouteBuilder
> > > anonymous class instead of the usual RouteBuilder (see below).  The only
> > > difference is that it gives immediate access to the fromXxx() and toXxx()
> > > methods that are generated as default methods on the interface, so
> > there's
> > > no need to import anything else.
> > > Please have a look and let me know what you think or if we see anything
> > to
> > > improve.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Guillaume
> > >
> > > protected RouteBuilder createRouteBuilder() throws Exception {
> > >     return new EndpointRouteBuilder() {
> > >         @Override
> > >         public void configure() throws Exception {
> > >             from(fromFile(start).initialDelay(0).delay(10).move(done +
> > > "/${file:name}"))
> > >                     .to(toMock("result"));
> > >         }
> > >     };
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > Le mer. 5 juin 2019 à 23:23, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > > I just pushed a branch called "endpoint-dsl".
> > > >
> > > > My goal is to experiment with an auto-generated DSL for endpoints,
> > mainly
> > > > to have a complete and type-safe java DSL for endpoints instead of
> > using
> > > > URI containing all the parameters.  Right now, it compiles but isn't
> > > really
> > > > usable at a DSL.
> > > > I'll get back as soon as I have something which can actually be used so
> > > > that we can discuss further various options.
> > > > My rough goal is to be able to write something like:
> > > >
> > > >    from(file("target/data/foo").delay(4000).backoffMultiplier(4
> > > > ).backoffIdleThreshold(2).backoffErrorThreshold(3))
> > > >       .to(mock("result"))
> > > >
> > > > instead of
> > > >
> > > >    from(
> > > >
> > >
> > "file://target/data/foo?delay=4000&backoffMultiplier=4&backoffIdleThreshold=2&backoffErrorThreshold=3"
> > > > )
> > > >       .to("mock:result")
> > > >
> > > > Stay tuned !
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ------------------------
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to