Hi, I'm +1 with LTS support, but what are the benefits of such strict
schedule?

I think that would be better to release as LTS whenever it makes sense.

my2cents

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 5:59 AM Ajmera, Hemang C <hemang.ajm...@cgi.com> wrote:

> Hi
>    From the user perspective LTS is a welcome move. I liked the approach
> which is proposed here. You can also refer to Ubuntu release cycle[1] where
> every 6 month there is new release and every 2 year there is LTS release.
> LTS are supported for 5 years. So if we sum up, Every fourth release is
> LTS, and life of LTS is for 2.5 LTS cycle.
>
> For camel world the release would be more frequent compared to Ubuntu
>
> So every six month 1 LTS and two releases in between should be fine. If we
> want more frequent release we can have 3 non LTS release in between, i.e.
> release after every 6 weeks.
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Hemang Ajmera
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 02 March 2020 17:00
> To: dev <dev@camel.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Tentative release schedule for Camel 3.x releases in 2020
>
> Ups the last two should be flipped, eg
>
> Camel 3.5.0 in Oct 2020 (no LTS)
> Camel 3.6.0 in Dec 2020 (LTS)
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:26 PM Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Lets put a tentative release schedule for Camel 3.x for this year,
> > where we make it more obvious which releases are LTS and which are
> > not.
> >
> > For example having 2 yearly LTS releases and then non TLS in between
> > allows us to innovate and move faster, but also offer production safe
> > stable branches where end users can stay on for a longer time and get
> > CVE and important/critical bugfixes only. Note that we should shy away
> > from doing other fixes on these LTS branches as they are meant for
> > "rock sold and only really important bug fixes". Not small
> > improvements, and it would be nice to have if X can also do this etc.
> > Lets put this kind into the non LTS releases first (when possible).
> >
> > A plan could be something like
> >
> > Camel 3.1.0 in Feb 2020 (no LTS)
> > Camel 3.2.0 in April 2020 (no LTS)
> > Camel 3.3.0 in June 2020 (LTS)
> > Camel 3.4.0 in Aug 2020 (no LTS)
> > Camel 3.5.0 in Oct 2020 (LTS)
> > Camel 3.6.0 in Dec 2020 (no LTS)
> >
> > And then we do Camel 3.3.x and 3.6.x patch releases from time to time,
> > and for about 12 months, eg 2 LTS's back, eg 3.3.x is EOL when Camel
> > 3.9.0 LTS is released (about 1 year later).
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > Claus Ibsen
> > -----------------
> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>

Reply via email to