It looks like AWS s3 static websites don’t do indexified pages, so a bunch of 
front page links to some/dir/ rather than some/dir/index.html don’t work.  Fill 
in the index.html by hand :-)

David Jencks

> On Mar 20, 2020, at 7:30 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi, I have PRs and a couple of previews for the EIP reorganization…
> I've pushed previews:
> as a separate component:
> https://camel-preview-1.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/index.html 
> <https://camel-preview-1.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/index.html>
> as a module under components:
> https://camel-preview-2.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/index.html 
> <https://camel-preview-2.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/index.html>
> I have a slight preference for the second arrangement.
> I also reorganized the user manual nav slightly and the components nav 
> slightly.
> The components nav now has index pages for each major heading, and the data 
> format and language lists are removed from the components list.
> 
> The images came back for the EIP table :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> David Jencks
> 
>> On Mar 20, 2020, at 7:55 AM, Andrea Cosentino <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello David,
>> 
>> No problem, there is no rush.
>> 
>> I just noticed that and reported here :-)
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Andrea
>> 
>> Il giorno ven 20 mar 2020 alle ore 15:52 David Jencks <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:
>> 
>>> Hi Andrea,
>>> 
>>> In my work towards 14747 the eip images have reappeared.  I’m hoping to
>>> get that ready today or tomorrow.  Will that be soon enough or should I fix
>>> them in the current master?
>>> 
>>> After rearranging the eip docs, I’ll look into the earlier versions.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> David Jencks
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 20, 2020, at 12:47 AM, Andrea Cosentino <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello David,
>>>> 
>>>> For 3.0.x and 2.x I think it would be good to use the same approach.
>>>> 
>>>> About the last merged work I noticed we are missing images in the EIP
>>> table
>>>> here:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> https://camel.apache.org/manual/latest/enterprise-integration-patterns.html 
>>> <https://camel.apache.org/manual/latest/enterprise-integration-patterns.html>
>>>> 
>>>> Can you have a look? Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Il giorno ven 20 mar 2020 alle ore 03:43 David Jencks <
>>>> [email protected]> ha scritto:
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for getting all these merged so smoothly!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should I close the associated Jira issue/tasks?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’m going to try out putting all the eip documentation in the same
>>> source
>>>>> location, with the partially generated source.  We discussed versioning
>>>>> this documentation, and one way to do that would be to include it in the
>>>>> components component.  Once all the source is in the same place it’s
>>> easy
>>>>> to move the target component/location around, so unless you’re sure you
>>>>> want a separate eip component, lets try eip as part of components first
>>> and
>>>>> see how it looks.
>>>>> CAMEL-14747 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-14747>
>>>>> 
>>>>> I haven’t looked at the 2.x and 3.0.x branches significantly.  Would it
>>> be
>>>>> desirable to organize them similarly to latest, or would it be better to
>>>>> leave them as they are, to not surprise people used to the current
>>>>> organization?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> David Jencks
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 7:15 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’ve opened 4 PRs associated with subtasks of CAMEL-14698 <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-14698>.  There’s some
>>>>> explanation in the subtask comments.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do not try to test the camel-website PR until all the other PRs are
>>>>> merged.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In each PR branch I’ve squashed my work into a single commit.  If you
>>>>> want to see smaller changes, look at these branches in
>>>>> https://github.com/djencks/camel.git <
>>> https://github.com/djencks/camel.git>
>>>>> :
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> issue-14698-rearrange-adocs (for master)
>>>>>> camel-3.0.x-issue-14698
>>>>>> camel-2.x-issue-14698
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The last two are, I think, just fixing some xref targets.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To build using the PR branches, check out
>>>>> https://github.com/djencks/camel-website.git <
>>>>> https://github.com/djencks/camel-website.git> branch
>>>>> issue-14698-rearrange-adocs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> David Jencks
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 16, 2020, at 11:48 PM, Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think it would be good to open the PRs so at least someone can
>>> review.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Il mar 17 mar 2020, 06:27 David Jencks <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> ha
>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I’m hesitant to make any more changes before what I have now is
>>>>> accepted
>>>>>>>> and applied, and the longer we wait the more difficult it will be to
>>>>> rebase
>>>>>>>> on the changes occurring in master.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What is needed to move this forward?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is going to need at least 4 PRs to merge, and the one for
>>>>>>>> camel-website can’t be tested until the other 3 are applied.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> David Jencks
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2020, at 8:02 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Zoran,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2020, at 6:28 AM, Zoran Regvart <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 6:51 AM David Jencks <
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW there are a few errors from other components building the
>>> site:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: contributor-guide.adoc: line 123: invalid
>>>>> style
>>>>>>>> for listing block: code
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: native-mode.adoc: line 11: invalid style for
>>>>>>>> listing block: code
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: native-mode.adoc: line 20: invalid style for
>>>>>>>> listing block: code
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> camel-version
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> server-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> database-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> table-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> server-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> database-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> table-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> server-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> database-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> table-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> server-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> database-name
>>>>>>>>>>> asciidoctor: WARNING: skipping reference to missing attribute:
>>>>>>>> table-name
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The first three are in camel-quarkus.  I haven’t found the others.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I see server-name, database-name, table-name appearing in the
>>>>> Debezium
>>>>>>>>>> component docs. Perhaps it would be a good task for Outreachy
>>>>>>>>>> applicants to find and fix those (CAMEL-13923). We could work on
>>>>>>>>>> adding a check either to the build - to scan the output and fail on
>>>>>>>>>> these warnings; or in the Maven tooling to check for these issues.
>>>>>>>>>> That way we would fail quickly and correct these.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It’s going to be easy to make the maven build break on Antora errors
>>>>>>>> and/or warnings after https://gitlab.com/antora/antora/-/issues/145
>>> <
>>>>> https://gitlab.com/antora/antora/-/issues/145> <
>>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/antora/antora/-/issues/145 <
>>>>> https://gitlab.com/antora/antora/-/issues/145>> is finished and
>>> probably
>>>>>>>> not worth it before then (I implemented most of one solution for
>>> this:
>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> hope it gets into Antora 3).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I ran the build against my logging antora version and got this more
>>>>>>>> precise information:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> version: latest component: camel-quarkus file:
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/contributor-guide.adoc path contributor-guide.adoc
>>>>>>>> lineno: 123 message: invalid style for listing block: code
>>>>>>>>> version: latest component: camel-quarkus file:
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/native-mode.adoc path native-mode.adoc lineno: 11
>>>>>>>> message: invalid style for listing block: code
>>>>>>>>> version: latest component: camel-quarkus file:
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/native-mode.adoc path native-mode.adoc lineno: 20
>>>>>>>> message: invalid style for listing block: code
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/azure-blob-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>> message:
>>>>>>>> skipping reference to missing attribute: camel-version
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-mongodb-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: server-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-mongodb-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: database-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-mongodb-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: table-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-mysql-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>> skipping reference to missing attribute: server-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-mysql-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>> skipping reference to missing attribute: database-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-mysql-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>> skipping reference to missing attribute: table-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-postgres-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: server-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-postgres-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: database-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-postgres-component.adoc lineno: undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: table-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-sqlserver-component.adoc lineno:
>>> undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: server-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-sqlserver-component.adoc lineno:
>>> undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: database-name
>>>>>>>>> version: 3.0.x component: components file: undefined path
>>>>>>>> modules/ROOT/pages/debezium-sqlserver-component.adoc lineno:
>>> undefined
>>>>>>>> message: skipping reference to missing attribute: table-name
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> David Jencks
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to