Using the private package I proposed some days ago would simplify the 
dependency alignement (using the one defined in the component).

I will move forward on that one.

Regards
JB

> Le 31 août 2020 à 09:30, Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> reverted. Probably we need to relax a bit on the karaf alignment side
> 
> Il giorno lun 31 ago 2020 alle ore 09:26 Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
> 
>> Sounds good, let me revert than
>> 
>> Il lun 31 ago 2020, 09:24 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:06 AM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Ok, I aligned to the new bundle.
>>>> 
>>>> For Kafka 2.6.0, I would wait a bit, there some changes in the codebase
>>> and
>>>> it would be better to have a deeper look.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll going back to Kafka 2.5.0 from 2.5.1, since the karaf feature is
>>> still
>>>> at 2.5.0
>>> 
>>> I frankly dont think the rest of the world should suffer because karaf
>>> is behind.
>>> For example spring boot is at 2.5.1
>>> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/releases/tag/v2.3.3.RELEASE
>>> 
>>> So I suggest to go back to 2.5.1.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Other than that we're ok.
>>>> 
>>>> Il giorno lun 31 ago 2020 alle ore 07:17 Andrea Cosentino <
>>> anco...@gmail.com>
>>>> ha scritto:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We could still align some dependency like the kafka one.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll try to do that today.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Il giorno lun 31 ago 2020 alle ore 07:16 Claus Ibsen <
>>>>> claus.ib...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Okay all the branches are ready for building the RC.
>>>>>> Gregor do you have time to cut the release?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Claus Ibsen
>>>>>> -----------------
>>>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>>>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> -----------------
>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to