No objection, but this was related to a general discussion about binary distribution of all the Camel subprojects.
Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 14:16 Jean-Baptiste Onofre < [email protected]> ha scritto: > Hi, > > What about a Karaf-camel (I proposed and started to work on karamel ;) ) ? > > I have a branch where I have karamel distribution (including resources for > Kubernetes). > > If there’s no objection, I will create the camel-karat PR. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB > > > Le 14 déc. 2020 à 14:37, Zoran Regvart <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > Hi Cameleers, > > we're discussing binary distribution on two issues[1][2]. The binary > > distribution is the tar.gz/ZIP file linked from the Camel website. By > > ASF policy we only ship source code, and the binary distribution is > > optional. > > > > Back in the dark days, before using build tools that knew about > > dependency management (Maven, Gradle...) folk used to use the binary > > distribution. > > > > I've found some statistics on downloads/per day, for us[3]/eu[4] and > > created these charts: > > > > https://s.apache.org/camel-dl-us > > https://s.apache.org/camel-dl-eu > > > > The data is over 2 and 1/4 years, we've had 19.7+-8.8 via US, and > > 20.24+-8.43 in via EU per day. So not that much IMHO. > > > > I'm wondering if anyone is still relying on these, and if so what > > would a binary distribution look like for sub projects? Should we do > > the same as we do for the Camel core? > > > > Please reply on this thread or chime in on those issues for > > sub-project specific concerns. > > > > Thanks :) > > > > zoran > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/2045 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/camel-kafka-connector/issues/754 > > [3] https://www-us.apache.org/dyn/stats/camel.log > > [4] https://www-eu.apache.org/dyn/stats/camel.log > > -- > > Zoran Regvart > >
