lburgazzoli commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-kamelets/pull/2#issuecomment-777351133
> > random thought: > > > > * we should probably have some way of grouping kamelets, i.e. there may be a number of telegram related kamelets > > * we shold think about versioning > > Yeah, so versioning can be done by tagging this repo as [per proposal](https://github.com/apache/camel-k/blob/master/proposals/provided-kamelets.adoc?rgh-link-date=2021-02-11T10%3A25%3A27Z). Antora supports multiple versions oob. > I was more thinking about kamelet specific versions, giving that they can be used even without a catalog, whould we also let people browse to a specific kamelet version ? > There's a `camel.apache.org/kamelet.group=<name of the group>` label that should be used for grouping. The UI still does not support that but that's an improvement. > I wonder if we should make the group mandatory and have it for all Kamelets. The catalog can have both a link to a page where single kamelets of a group are listed (if more than one), but also direct links to the specific Kamelets in the display box. +1 for making group mandatory ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
