Thanks Claus, that's definitely a good idea on the source code level!

We do something similar in the components reference https://camel.apache.org/components/latest/index.html
I wonder whether it is the same grouping?

And I wonder whether we could add the group info to camel-catalog?

I would not mind following the same structure in Camel Quarkus. Getting the info via Camel Catalog would simplify both the transition and the maintenance.

Thanks,

-- Peter

On 11/03/2021 07:05, Tadayoshi Sato wrote:
Great idea.

+1

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:17 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> wrote:

Yeah, it makes sense.

+1.

We need to create some issues to track these down.

Il giorno mer 10 mar 2021 alle ore 12:15 Claus Ibsen <
claus.ib...@gmail.com>
ha scritto:

Hi

To make maintaining Camel components easier, and to avoid the
components root folder gets too big, then recently we have moved cloud
components into aws, google etc.

I think we could do the same for more components like
- debezium
- microprofile (all microprpofile modules)
- spring (all spring modules)
- test (unit test and testcontainers)



--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2





Reply via email to