It looks to me you have something personal with me, because each time I write something you suddenly appear and ask why, reporting rules.. what is exactly your problem with me?
Il dom 19 dic 2021, 20:26 Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > And btw i know the ASF rules better than you. To me 72 hours doesn't make > any sense and I'm trying to use my brain instead of reporting a well known > rule. > > Il dom 19 dic 2021, 20:23 Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> For any other problem you can write to the board. >> >> Il dom 19 dic 2021, 20:21 Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> ha >> scritto: >> >>> What's the reason for having 72 hours of release window if this is not >>> an important release but just a middle release? I don't see good reason, >>> just a rule 20 years old, that should be revisited. >>> >>> Btw, David, it looks to me you're trying to create problems here. The >>> vote will be for 72 hours. Please stop it, now. You won. >>> >>> Il dom 19 dic 2021, 20:06 David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> ha >>> scritto: >>> >>>> https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval < >>>> https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval> >>>> >>>> I think it’s entirely appropriate that I ask why you are not following >>>> the well known: >>>> >>>> `Release votes SHOULD remain open for at least 72 hours.` >>>> >>>> To me this means that any shorter release vote needs a good >>>> justification. What does it mean to you? You say it’s not a critical >>>> release, so what’s the hurry? >>>> >>>> David Jencks >>>> >>>> > On Dec 19, 2021, at 9:40 AM, Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > It's not a critical release i meant to say >>>> > >>>> > Il dom 19 dic 2021, 18:36 Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> ha >>>> scritto: >>>> > >>>> >> It's a critical release and we already done it in the past. If you >>>> any >>>> >> troubles we could extend to 72 hours. But i don't see why. For some >>>> sub >>>> >> projects we use 48 hours. >>>> >> >>>> >> It looks to me you're looking for problems where they don't exist. >>>> >> >>>> >> Let's do 72 hours. I don't want complaints. >>>> >> >>>> >> Il dom 19 dic 2021, 18:29 David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> ha >>>> >> scritto: >>>> >> >>>> >>> What justifies the shorter-than-standard-72-hours voting window? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> David Jencks >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 19, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'll release tomorrow morning and open a vote for 48 hours, since >>>> this >>>> >>> will >>>> >>>> be outside camel-k. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Il sab 18 dic 2021, 10:05 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> ha >>>> >>> scritto: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I think it would be good to get a new release of kamelets that >>>> works >>>> >>>>> well with the new Camel 3.14.0 release. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> We did some updates to the yaml-dsl in 3.14 that requires a new >>>> >>>>> release of kamelets to work. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>> >>>>> ----------------- >>>> >>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>>> >>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>>
