+1 for having LTS releases for Camel K. On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:31 PM Pasquale Congiusti < pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks, > I am not sure if this was discussed in the past, but here goes my proposal > to officially extend the LTS concept to Camel K releases as well. Since we > depend on Camel Quarkus and Camel framework for the runtime, we should > follow the same path in order to be able to apply any fix/upgrade in the > proper release version. For example, right now we're not actively > supporting the 1.8 release, which is based on Camel Quarkus 2.7 and Camel > 3.14 (both LTS). I think it would be good from a user point of view, > relying on some long time support release. Also from the developer point of > view, it will give us a certain capability to plan ahead of time on which > release to focus to enable more stability. > > Please, share your feedback. > > Regards, > Pasquale. > -- Tadayoshi Sato
