Hello, I also think it would make sense to have this component directly in Camel. >From what I understand, it doesn't seem very big, so it would be rather easy to onboard.
Kind regards On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 9:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi, > > yes, it makes sense to have such component directly in Camel, easier > to maintain with new Camel changes/updates. > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 5:53 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Moving the component to Camel is more than welcome. > > > > We might help with the migration for sure. > > > > Thanks for reaching out to us. > > > > Il giorno mer 12 ott 2022 alle ore 16:06 Christofer Dutz < > > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> ha scritto: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > after a few chats at last week’s ApacheCon, I would like to start a > > > discussion on moving the Apache PLC4X Camel components into the Apache > > > Camel project. > > > > > > With these components, we are able to read data from industrial > > > programmable logic controllers or other hardware and stream that into > Camel > > > or consume data in Camel and write this information back into the PLCs. > > > > > > We started off building the components in PLC4X, but I think there are > > > several benefits for bringing it to the Camel project such as: > > > > > > * Having the components listed in the official “Camel Store” for > easy > > > setup > > > * Having the components maintained to keep them up to date with > > > changes in Camel > > > > > > I know that on the other side, if we moved the components here, the > Camel > > > project now would need to react to changes in the PLC4X project, but > our > > > Read/Write/Subscribe API has generally been pretty stable and the ones > > > we’re currently fine-tuning (Auto-Discover, Browse) are ones the > components > > > not yet utilize. > > > > > > I’d also be willing to come along and take care of maintaining PLC4X > > > related changes. > > > > > > What do you folks think? We had discussed this in the Apache PLC4X > project > > > before and then it was general consensus, that we’d love to do this. > But I > > > would re-activate that discussion on our list, if there’s interest on > your > > > side. > > > > > > Chris > > > > -- Otavio R. Piske http://orpiske.net
