Hi Bhavya Currently, 1.2.0 propose to support presto version with 0.166. Is there any performance difference between 0.179 and 0.166?
Regards Liang 2017-07-01 13:12 GMT+08:00 Bhavya Aggarwal <bha...@knoldus.com>: > Hi, > > Please find the configuration setting that we used attached with this > email , we are running Presto Server 0.179 for our testing. > > Thanks and regards > Bhavya > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:23 AM, linqer <26304...@qq.com> wrote: > >> Can you give me your all configuration files (etc/) of coordinate and >> worker, >> What configuration tuning did you make for carbondata? >> >> A lot of scenes in our company are using Presto,I have tested presto read >> orc vs carbondata , Carbondata is clearly inferior to Orc; >> >> During the testing, for performance reasons, we used replica join in >> particular, and we increased the JVM codecache size. but these are equally >> fair to both ORC and carbondata >> >> Carbondata_vs_ORC_on_Presto_Benchmark_testing.docx >> <http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n >> 5.nabble.com/file/n16849/Carbondata_vs_ORC_on_Presto_Benchma >> rk_testing.docx> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-m >> ailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-CarbonD >> ata-Integration-with-Presto-tp16793p16849.html >> Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list >> archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
