Hi Thanks you participated in discussion.
Currently, CarbonData has been formally deployed by many users. Just like i mentioned in the previous post, take 1.0.0,it would be helpful to reduce maintenance cost through distinguishing the major different version. Regards Liang cenyuhai wrote > -1 > I think 1.0.0 should be a production-ready version, when we think carbon > is ready, we can change it to 1.0.0. > > > Regards > yuhai > > > > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > 发件人: "sujith chacko";< > sujithchacko.2010@ > >; > 发送时间: 2016年11月25日(星期五) 下午5:30 > 收件人: "dev"< > dev@.apache > >; > > 主题: Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for nextversion > (to 1.0.0) > > > > +1 > > Thanks, > Sujith > > On Nov 24, 2016 10:37 PM, "manish gupta" < > tomanishgupta18@ > > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Regards >> Manish Gupta >> >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal < > kumarvishal1802@ > > >> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > -Regards >> > Kumar Vishal >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Raghunandan S < >> > > carbondatacontributions@ >> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 2:30 PM, Liang Chen < > chenliang6136@ > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi >> > > > >> > > > Ya, good proposal. >> > > > CarbonData 0.x version integrate with spark 1.x, and the load data >> > > > solution >> > > > of 0.x version is using kettle. >> > > > CarbonData 1.x version integrate with spark 2.x, the load data >> solution >> > > of >> > > > 1.x version will not use kettle . >> > > > >> > > > That would be helpful to reduce maintenance cost through >> distinguishing >> > > the >> > > > major different version. >> > > > >> > > > +1 for the proposal. >> > > > >> > > > Regards >> > > > Liang >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Venkata Gollamudi wrote >> > > > > Hi All, >> > > > > >> > > > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot >> of >> > > > > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements. >> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-320? >> > jql=project%20%3D% >> > > >> 20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.2.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY% >> > > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >> > > > > >> > > > > Next version has many major and new value added features are >> planned, >> > > > > taking CarbonData capability to next level. >> > > > > Like >> > > > > - IUD(Insert-Update-Delete) support, >> > > > > - complete rewrite of data load flow with out Kettle, >> > > > > - Spark 2.x support, >> > > > > - Standardize CarbonInputFormat and CarbonOutputFormat, >> > > > > - alluxio(tachyon) file system support, >> > > > > - Carbon thrift format optimization for fast query, >> > > > > - Data loading performance improvement and In memory off heap >> > sorting, >> > > > > - Query performance improvement using off heap, >> > > > > - Support Vectorized batch reader. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-301? >> > jql=project%20%3D% >> > > >> 20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.3.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY% >> > > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >> > > > > >> > > > > I think it makes sense to change CarbonData Major version in next >> > > version >> > > > > to 1.0.0. >> > > > > Please comment and vote on this. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Ramana >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > View this message in context: >> > > > http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556. >> > > n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number- >> > > increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3157.html >> > > > Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing list >> > archive >> > > > at Nabble.com. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> -- View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3199.html Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
