On 15 February 2011 22:20, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 February 2011 22:19, Stephen Connolly > <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 15 February 2011 22:18, Stephen Connolly >> <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 15 February 2011 21:57, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release. I >>>> propose the following for 0.7.2. >>>> >>>> SVN: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 >>> >>> Minor niggle, that revision has the build.xml with base.version=0.7.1 >> >> Ahhh sorry my fault.... you changed the branch url >> > > But the changed url is still having the wrong base.version!
Less haste more speed. Never mind problem was between keyboard and chair ;-) > > -Stephen > >>> >>> I'm re-staging the artifacts in repository.apache.org >>> >>> -Stephen >>> >>>> 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans >>>> >>>> The delta here is pretty small, so if no one objects, we can reduce the >>>> voting period to 24 hours. >>>> >>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2165 >>>> [2]: http://goo.gl/iI7U2 (CHANGES.txt) >>>> [3]: http://goo.gl/b2dCq (NEWS.txt) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Eric Evans >>>> eev...@rackspace.com >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
