On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm +1 on either these artifacts as is, or these artifacts with thrift >> rebuilt to reflect the correct api version > > Unless someone object strongly I'm probably going to be lazy and not rebuild > the > artifacts to reflect the correct api. My own "justification" for my > laziness is that I > don't want to get into the habit of releasing artifacts that have not > been voted on > (I know I'm awesome but I still make errors sometimes). Besides, 1.0.2 already > has the "wrong" version so "fixing" it now or with 1.0.4 don't seem to make > much > of a difference to me. This would also be time consuming for me :) > (would require > a specific svn branch and whatnot).
Go for it (+1). -- Eric Evans Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu