On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm +1 on either these artifacts as is, or these artifacts with thrift
>> rebuilt to reflect the correct api version
>
> Unless someone object strongly I'm probably going to be lazy and not rebuild 
> the
> artifacts to reflect the correct api. My own "justification" for my
> laziness is that I
> don't want to get into the habit of releasing artifacts that have not
> been voted on
> (I know I'm awesome but I still make errors sometimes). Besides, 1.0.2 already
> has the "wrong" version so "fixing" it now or with 1.0.4 don't seem to make 
> much
> of a difference to me. This would also be time consuming for me :)
> (would require
> a specific svn branch and whatnot).

Go for it (+1).

-- 
Eric Evans
Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu

Reply via email to