Is Jenkins smart enough to be able to say, "I know we had X findbugs warnings previously, which are known to be false positives, but now there are X+1" ?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am sure no one would have an issue with an optional findbugs target. > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Radim Kolar <h...@filez.com> wrote: >> was any decision about findbugs made? you do not consider code style >> recommended by findbugs as good practice which should be followed? >> >> I can submit few findbugs patches, but it will probably turns into flamewar >> WE vs FINDBUGS like there: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8619 >> >> findbugs problems are pretty easy to fix and there are just 70 of them, it >> could be done in two days. >> >> I do not care about findbugs+cas-dev issue much because i need to fork >> cassandra anyway to get performance patches there. Its just matter of >> schedule for me if 1 should feed you fb patches before i fork it. -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support http://www.datastax.com