Is Jenkins smart enough to be able to say, "I know we had X findbugs
warnings previously, which are known to be false positives, but now
there are X+1" ?

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am sure no one would have an issue with an optional findbugs target.
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Radim Kolar <h...@filez.com> wrote:
>> was any decision about findbugs made? you do not consider code style
>> recommended by findbugs as good practice which should be followed?
>>
>> I can submit few findbugs patches, but it will probably turns into flamewar
>> WE vs FINDBUGS like there:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8619
>>
>> findbugs problems are pretty easy to fix and there are just 70 of them, it
>> could be done in two days.
>>
>> I do not care about findbugs+cas-dev issue much because i need to fork
>> cassandra anyway to get performance patches there. Its just matter of
>> schedule for me if 1 should feed you fb patches before i fork it.



-- 
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support
http://www.datastax.com

Reply via email to