Hi, I do like Sylvain's proposal too. And, from a user perspective, I agree with Kurt that having (at least) 2 "bug fixing only" branches instead of 1 would be great.
De : kurt Greaves <k...@instaclustr.com> A : dev@cassandra.apache.org, Date : 19/11/2016 07:42 Objet : Re: Proposals for releases - 4.0 and beyond Option 3 seems the most reasonable and the clearest from a user perspective. The main thing I'd be concerned about with a 6 month cycle would be how short a branch is supported for. Most users will be bound to a specific release for at least 2 years, and we still find bugs in 2.1 2 years since release. The only adjustment I would make would be to support branches for 1.5 - 2 years before EOL.
