Jeff, fantastic idea. +1 John, i'd prefer to get the non-PA ones out of the way first. With PA, someone at least tried to improve to software.
I'm not at a computer now, but it would be instructive to have a beak down of those types of tickets by age. I can do that later. Jason On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 16:56 Eduard Tudenhoefner < eduard.tudenhoef...@datastax.com> wrote: > +1, if it turns out that something is still valid/important, then people > can always re-open. > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There's a number of JIRAs that are old - sometimes very old - that > > represent bugs that either don't exist in modern versions, or don't have > > sufficient information for us to repro, but the reporter has gone away. > > > > Would anyone be offended if I start tagging these with the label > > 'UnableToRepro' or 'Unresponsive' and start a 30 day timer to close them? > > Anyone have a better suggestion? > > > > > > -- > > [image: DataStaxLogo copy3.png] <http://www.datastax.com/> > > Eduard Tudenhoefner > > Software Engineer | +49 151 206 111 97 | eduard.tudenhoef...@datastax.com > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=192476828> > <https://www.facebook.com/datastax> <https://twitter.com/etudenhoefner> > <https://plus.google.com/+Datastax/about> > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/datastax> <https://github.com/nastra/> >
