Thanks all for your input. The consensus is to go forward with this ticket.
Dinesh
On Friday, February 15, 2019, 12:54:20 PM PST, Sumanth Pasupuleti
<[email protected]> wrote:
+1
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:14 PM Dikang Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:27 AM Vinay Chella <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > We have been using Zstd compressor across different products/services
> here
> > and have seen significant improvements, getting this in 4.0 would be a
> big
> > win.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vinay Chella
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:19 AM Jeff Jirsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeff Jirsa
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Feb 15, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Jonathan Ellis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > IMO "add a new compression class that has demonstrable benefits to
> > Sushma
> > > > and Joseph" is sufficiently noninvasive that we should allow it into
> > 4.0.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dinesh Joshi
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hey folks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Just wanted to get a pulse on whether we can proceed with ZStd
> > support.
> > > >> The consensus on the ticket was that it’s a very valuable addition
> > > without
> > > >> any risk of destabilizing 4.0. It’s ready to go if there aren’t any
> > > >> objections.
> > > >>
> > > >> Dinesh
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jonathan Ellis
> > > > co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
> > > > @spyced
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dikang
>
