> This is a fair point. But a CEP isn't required to solve this. I think the work contained in this CEP is necessary to safely solving this problem, and I have some empirical evidence in favour of this assertion.
From: Brandon Williams <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 13 July 2021 at 13:39 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-10: Cluster and Code Simulations On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:31 AM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Furthermore, we introduced a significant performance regression in all lines > of the software by increasing the number of LWT round-trips. Unless we intend > to leave this regression for a further year without _any_ release offering a > solution, we will need suitable verification mechanisms for whatever fixes we > deliver. > > My view is that it is unacceptable to leave such a significant regression > unaddressed in all lines of software we intend to release for the foreseeable > future. This is a fair point. But a CEP isn't required to solve this. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
