I agree with Benedict, this does not need to have its own CEP. In the "approach" section to-be-discussed CEP-17, I clearly see this is building on top of what is already in so I do not think this needs yet another CEP to materialize.
Regards On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 12:00, bened...@apache.org <bened...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Maulin, > > This sounds fine to me, though I don’t consider myself well versed in these > system details. > > I have a meta comment though: I think this could easily have been a Jira with > a DISCUSS thread brought to the list. The CEP process is (in my opinion) for > complex decisions that needs broad consent from the community, whereas this > seems like a straightforward feature we might want to advertise to ensure > others have an opportunity to offer their expertise and opinions on. > > > From: Maulin Vasavada <maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> > Date: Monday, 11 October 2021 at 06:54 > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org <dev@cassandra.apache.org> > Subject: [DISCUSS] CEP-17: Add support for PEM based key material for SSL > Hi all, > > I would like to start this discussion thread for the CEP-17 > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-17%3A+Add+support+for+PEM+based+key+material+for+SSL>. > I think it would be a great addition to support a commonly used format for > private keys and trusted certificates for SSL configurations. > > Thank you. > Maulin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
