+100 to this

We'd have to come up w/ a pretty compelling counterexample to NOT switch
the default to mmap_index_only at this point.

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:40 AM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17237 I think it
> makes sense.  At the least I think we should restore disk_access_mode
> so that users are more aware of the options available.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 10:50 AM Paulo Motta <pauloricard...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been bitten by OOMs with disk_access_mode:auto/mmap that were fixed
> by changing to disk_access_mode:mmap_index_only. In a particular benchmark
> I got 5x more read throughput on 3.11.x with disk_access_mode:
> mmap_index_only vs disk_access_mode: auto/mmap.
> >
> > Changing disk_access_mode to mmap_index_only seems to be a common
> recommendation on forums[1][2][3][4] and slack (find by searching
> disk_access_mode in the #cassandra channel on https://the-asf.slack.com/).
> >
> > It's not clear to me when using the default disk_access_mode:auto/mmap
> is beneficial, perhaps only when the read set fits in memory? Mick seems to
> think on CASSANDRA-15531 [5], that mmap_index_only has a higher heap cost
> and should be only used when warranted. However it's not uncommon to see
> people being bitten with OOMs or lower read performance due to the default
> disk_access_mode, so it makes me think it's not the best fool-proof default.
> >
> > Should we consider changing default "auto" behavior of
> "disk_access_mode" to be "mmap_index_only" instead of "mmap" in 5.0 since
> it's likely safer and perhaps more performant?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Paulo
> >
> > [1]
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72272035/troubleshooting-and-fixing-cassandra-oom-issue
> > [2] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T137419
> > [3] https://stackoverflow.com/a/55975471
> > [4]
> https://support.datastax.com/s/article/FAQ-Use-of-disk-access-mode-in-DSE-51-and-earlier
> > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15531
>

Reply via email to