You can't change bits in a signed and checksummed artefact. You have to cut from scratch.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 20:28, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the last time I looked into it there was nothing in the > scripts that forced anything, but if that's not true I think we should > be fixing that, not having it drive our release decisions. > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:54 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 19:27, J. D. Jordan <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> That said. This is clearly better than and with many fixes from the > alpha. Would people be more comfortable if this cut was released as another > alpha and we do beta1 once the known fixes land? > > > > > > > > There is no way with our release process to do this. The QA label is > part of our version number and that's baked in. > > > > Otherwise I entirely agree that alpha2 would have been the better label > here. We are working in an unusual situation, one I hope we don't repeat. > > >
