I am also for the re-staging with CASSANDRA-20976 in. It seems its merge is imminent.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 3:59 PM Paulo Motta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Should we wait for CASSANDRA-20976 to land, since this is a user-facing issue > in 5.0? > > Also, is there any reason why we are releasing 4.0 and 5.0 but not 4.1 ? > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 2:56 AM Mick <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has >> > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered >> > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. >> >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> Checked >> - signing correct >> - checksums correct >> - source artefact builds (JDK 11+17) >> - binary artefact runs (JDK 11+17) >> - debian package runs (JDK 11+17) >> - debian repo runs (JDK 11+17) >> - redhat* package runs (JDK11+17) >> - redhat* repo runs (JDK 11+17) >> >>
