Yes and I’m not asking for wholesale conversion. The few time we need to add new syntax, we default to established SQL syntax. Example where this was already done was in CEP-52
> On Nov 4, 2025, at 11:56 AM, Jeff Jirsa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Conversion doesn't seem practical or desirable: it'd probably result in CQL > and a muddled version of SQL which wouldn't be beneficial for anyone.
