And worth mentioning. I don’t mind pushback. I don’t expect to get a blank
check to do whatever I want. The back and forth has been respectful and
raises a lot of good points. So push away!

On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 2:26 PM Patrick McFadin <[email protected]> wrote:

> You are pointing out several things that lead me to creating this work
> repo like I did.
>
> The phasing in my mind was start with the content and then phase 2, core
> build and deployment changes. For the users of Cassandra, my initial big
> lift was giving them first class docs(and are they?)
>
> The items you mentioned are when I start moving things over to trunk, and
> yes, there will be a lot of things to get through there. My hope is we can
> retire some tech debt along the way and make it easier to contribute
> changes. Different set of ideas there but on my mind.
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 11:53 AM Mick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> > If someone's active, wants to do it, and there's enough people who
>> agree with them (and nobody actively protesting), we should let things
>> progress.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I'm actively protesting :-) but not out of principle, out of
>> pragmatism.  It has to work, currently I am unsure how it can.  My
>> objection is avoiding us progressing down rabbit holes we later regret.
>>
>> Trying to be helpful… some questions to get going…
>> What version of antora are you using (we are currently stuck on 2.3) ?
>> How are the auto-generated configuration and nodetool pages included ?  Is
>> the in-docs search still working ?  are you using the cassandra-website
>> ui-bundle ?  are you including the current djencks/asciidoctor-openblock
>> hack ?
>>
>>
>> Probably the simplest test of feasibility is to get the following (from
>> cassandra-website) working:
>>
>> ./run.sh website build -g -u cassandra:
>> https://github.com/pmcfadin/cassandra.git -b
>> cassandra:cassandra6-docs-workzone
>>
>>
>> This can be done in parallel, but I don't believe should wait (because
>> there could be functionality this depends on that simply won't work), and I
>> will help out.
>
>

Reply via email to