Hello,
this may not be closely related to Castor, but let's see what your
opinion is on this topic: Recently there has been released the EJB 3.0
specification draft.
I didn't yet look deeper at the proposed specification.
But reading for example the section "EJB QL" at
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-2004/jw-0809-ejb_p.html
one can ask himself, whether this won't supersede Castor OQL.
Will there be some co-existence of Castor and this newer, reading
easier than ever
method for object persistence using Java 1.5 annotations?
May be Castor XML might be made compatible to EJB, so Castor OQL can
be replaced, while still providing the "XML <-> Java Object <-> SQL"
connection, which is currently the thing, which makes Castor unique
above other persistence libraries?
Regards,
Martin
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
