Hi, I uploaded a basic implementation as I promissed earlier in to CASTOR-2016. Werner, please be kind enough to review the code and provide me with some feedback. In the mean time I will keep on improving the code.
I have a small question on schema handling. There is a JAXB2 annotated class which has set of non-requried properties (REQUIRED=false). All the properties that this class has are non-required. Should these properties included under Choice or under sequence with minOcurrs=0? This is bit of a tricky question for me as the annotations are not helping me here. I appreciate if some one can help me to resolve this problem. Thanks, SD On 6/21/07, Sachith Dhanushka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Werner, Thanks for the answer. So I won't use any JAXB2 RI code. I am now working with JAXB2 reflection library found in https://jaxb2-reflection.dev.java.net/ and creating Castor model. Will post my initial bit of code soon. Thanks, SD On 6/20/07, Werner Guttmann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sachith, > > your task is to come up with a solution that adds certain functionality > to Castor to make it (or parts thereof) JAXB compliant. In the context > of this statement, JAXB compliance refers to the specification. > > Clearly, it cannot be as simple as taking parts of the JAXB reference > implementation and integrate it with Castor. There's plenty of issues > with this approach, which I should not have to explain to you, one of > them being licensing. > > Yes, nobody wants to re-invent the wheel, but simply pulling parts of > the JAXB RI into Castor is not an option. > > Regards > Werner > > Sachith Dhanushka wrote: > > Hi Werner and all, > > > > This is what I am trying to do now. As I commented in the JIRA also, > now > > I am using the java.net <http://java.net> jaxb2 reflection library > > instead of annongen Jam. So I am working on that now. > > > > In addition to that please let me know the feasibility of the > following > > approach as well. When I looked in to JAXB2 schema generation, I can > use > > the existing JAXB2 RI to get a DOM model of the schema. In other > words, > > we can give set of JAXB annotated classes and get the schema as a DOM > > model. Then we can create our Castor schema model by looking at the > DOM > > model. The problem with this approach is that we get an intermediate > DOM > > object model. But the advantage is this approach is that this is less > > error-prone and standard as we can use the implementation from the > JAXB > > RI itself. > > > > Please let me know what you think about this approach. > > > > Thanks, > > SD > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >
