To be honest, the feature to set it via configuration was just drafted
until now - Sorry for that.
the name should be "org.castor.xml.java_naming" as it is set for all
Castor XML stuff and it is about JavaNaming
I will check the properties files and send another reply with them
Regards
Joachim
On 07/09/2007, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joachim,
>
> I am just looking at XMLConfiguration and there's a property defined as
> follows:
>
> /**
> * Property specifying the 'type' of the Java naming conventions
> * to use. Values of this property must be either null or
> * the name of a class which extends [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> org.castor.xml.JavaNaming}.
> *
> * Possible values:
> * - null
> * - A class name (which extends [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> org.castor.xml.JavaNaming}).
> *
> * <pre>
> * org.castor.xml.java_naming
> * </pre>
> *
> */
> public static final String JAVA_NAMING =
> "org.castor.xml.java.naming";
>
> In castor.properties, this property does not exist at all, whereas in
> castor.xml.properties, you'll see the following entry:
>
> # Property specifying the 'type' of the Java naming conventions
> # to use. Values of this property must be either null or
> # the name of a class which extends [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> org.castor.xml.JavaNaming}.
> org.castor.xml.java_naming=
>
> Hmm .... a bit inconsistent. Given that we are going to drop all XML
> properties from castor.properties after all, I'd - at least - like to
> know what the correct name of the property is.
>
> Thanks
> Werner
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
