Hi Werner, I've added two wiki pages http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CASTOR/JAXB+test+cases+for+Schema+packages http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CASTOR/Schema+generator+architecture
Please take a look and give me your feedback. In addition, I will update the patch soon. Nice weekend, Bao On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bao, > > Le Duc Bao wrote: > > Hi Werner, > > > > Thanks for your comment on the patch. I've identified and classified test > > cases based on JAXB spec. > Any chances of making that classification available, e.g. in our Wiki ? > > > Hoping that you could help me to add the patch in > > SVN ... > Sure, no problem. > > > ...and give me permission to commit code, so that I can work directly to > > repository. > For the time being, this will not be an option. In other words, > cummulative patches atatched to Jira issues is the way forward. > > > Currently, the org.exolab.castor.xml.schema package and the > > org.castor.jaxb.reflection package are quite good and I could not find > any > > problem with my targeted goals. Up to now, it is OK for me to work with > > these APIs. > > > > In the last couple of weeks, I have done: > > - Study Schema API/ JAXB reflection API > > - Create some codes for testing org.exolab.castor.xml.schema package > Can I assume that there's more tests than those two attached to the > existing Jira issue ? > > > - Study JAXB2 specification and identify/classify potential use > cases/test > > cases of XML Schema generator. > > > > To progress the project, in the next two weeks, I continue writing test > > cases for schema package. > Great. Can you please frequently attach SVN diffs to a new Jira issue ? > The more we have in the public, the easier it will be for us (you, > Joachim and I) to cross-check our expectations. > > > In addition, I think that the best way for schema > > generator is start to write some unit tests. > Same as above. > > > So that I will understand > > deeply JAXB specification and generator requirement. Therefore, I will > > create a test framework and some unit test cases for XML Schema generator > at > > the same time writing test cases for schema package. > > > > In the following two weeks, I will focus on architecture and design > aspects > > of the generator. > Again, any thoughts that are worthwhile for us to look at, please add to > the Wiki. > > > > I warmly welcome your feedback and comments. > > > > Regards, > > Bao, > > > > P/S: As request from Ben, I put cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. > > > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Bao, > >> > >> just had a look at the patch attached > >> > >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2384 > >> > >> and I think that (incrementally) adding more and more test cases to the > >> 'schema' module as you progress through both assessing the current state > >> of things and the Jira specification definitely added value to the > >> project (and its code base). > >> > >> Having said that, can you please try to define your aims for the next > >> two weeks ? And maybe summarize (once or twice a week) what you have > >> been doing so far ? > >> > >> Specifically, have you found any restrictions on the 'schema' classes > >> that prevent us from meeting the goals as defined in the JAXB > >> specification ? > >> > >> In addition, I'd like you to watch a thread (to-be) on this mailing list > >> on a refactoring of the Class-/FieldInfo classes to allow for greater > >> modularity, pluggability and separation of concerns. > >> > >> Regards > >> Werner > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- Le Duc Bao I blog here http://leducbao.blogspot.com/
