"FindBugs" names seems to imply too much for an automated tool :-)
Can you post a report somewhere showing what kind of "bugs" it finds? Andrus On Feb 1, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
What would the general consensus be here of using FindBugs (http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/)? I just used the 1.1.1 version to analyze Cayenne 3.0 and it is reporting 1720 (potential) bugs (at least on my current source tree). I haven't used this tool much yet, but it seems like it could be useful. I also believe it has support to run in the background, like from an ant task. This could be useful for nightly builds. Or even like a weekly report of some kind. Thoughts? Thanks! /dev/mrg
