On 01/08/2007, at 2:29 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
FYI:As this affects Cayenne, I am posting an update to our dev list. JSR-317 is the JSR to develop JPA 2.0. Following a discussion on the jcp-open, ASF voted "NO" on the JSR-317 review:http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=4329It is unclear at this point what our prospects are on getting access to the JSR-317 certification (it should not affect JSR-220 work we are currently doing), but regardless of that I personally support nudging Sun to really open Java Community Process.
It is very interesting to see Intel, IBM and Redhat strongly supporting Apache's position on this. Excellent.
Even though Apache voted no, this JSR will go forward. What is the Apache position on being part of the expert group? (By the way, is Apache/OpenJPA/Cayenne PMC/Cayenne committers/Andrus on the expert group? Is it a per person thing or an organisation thing?) I understand and agree with Apache's position on the openness of the TCK, however it appears that JSR-317 will have an open TCK and there should be no licensing reason not to use it.
It is one thing to make a stand, but this might become an important JSR to implement in the future, so we can't ignore it.
Ari Maniatis --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis phone +61 2 9660 9700 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
