Yeah, the whole git-on-top-of-svn thing seems to lead to people
holding off commits till things are fully ready to go. This is not the
way I like to work (even though I really enjoy git capabilities). Not
sure how people work on SVN-less git projects? Do they publish an up-
to-date clone of their local repo on git-hub or something?
I am personally trying to commit as often as possible without breaking
the trunk, but still, there has to be a better way...
Andrus
On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 18/11/2008, at 9:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I don't care that much about the @Ignore annotation, as I am using
git, so I keep all my failing tests in the local repo, but I
certainly have no objections to the upgrade idea in general.
That's great you've kept them in git, I was wondering where they
went. But if we use the @ignore then they would be more visible to
others who might be inspired to fix them or be aware of the failing
test.
No big deal, just a thought.
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
