I'm still having some difficulty reproducing the problem with CAY-1058. It is something I'm actively looking into, but I also don't think it's large enough to warrant holding up a release. We can mark it as experimental in the docs and move on with the release.
-- Kevin On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So any comments on CAY-1135 and CAY-1058? If not, I think we can tag the > release and start testing. > > Andrus > > > On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> Hi Borut, >> >> Nice site :-) >> >> M5 is coming out soon. As far as I can tell there are only two open Jiras >> against it: CAY-1135 (which is likely not a bug, but rather a local machine >> config issue) and CAY-1058 (which I also think is not a bug). So we should >> actually tag the repo and proceed with testing and release of M5. >> >> Can't comment on tapestry-cayenne... >> >> Andrus >> >> >> On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Borut Bolčina wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> what is the current status of the next milestone release? I am having a >>> problem using Cayenne 3M4 with tapestry-cayenne 0.2-SNAPSHOT. Can both >>> projects be released soon, as the latter is only compatible with Cayenne >>> 3.0-SNAPSHOT? We are planning to use Cayenne Tapestry combo for next >>> project >>> (hundreds of thousands of daily users) and this is currently a setback >>> for >>> us. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Borut >>> >>> P.S. Andrus, I have one more success story. This is the frontend app ( >>> http://moj.najdi.si) which is using Cayenne on the frontened and there >>> are >>> also some backend services using Cayenne (C3M4). It is a iGoogle like >>> "portal" which we are planning to upgrade in the near future - that is >>> why I >>> am nagging about the compatibility issue also discussed at >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/tapestry5-cayenne-development/browse_thread/thread/0c6ac34a2cfcbe50# >> >> > >
