Sure. I am fine with keeping it as well. I guess this is mainly a
documentation issue - it has to be mentioned that this is just one
possible usage pattern, not *the* way to access ObjectContext.
Andrus
On Dec 1, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I agree with Andrey here. I think it is better for Cayenne to provide
this in a consistent/standardized way for those who want it rather
than requiring people to roll their own each time. Those who need
something more complex can implement something more complex, but let's
keep the common case easy/standard.
mrg
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Andrey Razumovsky
<[email protected]> wrote:
2009/12/1 Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
This is just a convenience in Cayenne. Nobody's forced to use it.
I will go
as far as to suggest to remove it from Cayenne 3.1 as a built-in
feature,
and just document it as a possible design pattern in a user
application.
I'm -1. We can see some profit in moving it from BC class (say, to
new
"Cayenne" utility). But I'm sure it is widely used by everyone who
uses
Cayenne in web apps (or maybe even in desktop apps)