On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I was thinking we'd add a utility type method for now.
Cool.
I have no expectations of modifying 3.0 for this, but was thinking it might be good in the future to have something similar.
I am sure we will. I am stumbling over 'localObject' pretty often myself. It has to be done better.
Andrus
