This was my concern all along. Calling a class "Cayenne" imposes certain expectations. This should be a collection of frequently-used utility methods.
Andrus On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > >> I wonder if that >> class will just start to become a dumping ground in the future? > > That's what we certainly should try to avoid. > > Andrus >
