Tonight I fixed legacy docs wrappers and created small per-version menus for 
each piece of the docs. Also checked in a bunch of smaller things, like the 
Twitter button, doc titles with version in them, etc.

News seems to be the only thing remaining before we can go live.

Andrus

On Oct 31, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 31/10/12 5:20pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> I'll take a look at porting the news. Don't think we need to port many past 
>> news.
> 
> Some would be nice to give the project history.
> 
>>> Why can't the third template extend skeleton?
>> 
>> My thinking was that we don't need left hand menu for the docs. For instance 
>> looking at Docbook produced HTML I like how clean and distraction free it 
>> is. Wanted to keep that across the board for docs. I would imagine we'll 
>> just need a Cayenne header with a backlink to the main site, and a 
>> copyright/privacy policy footer. Anyways, I'll refactor the templates to 
>> maybe have a single skeleton and optional menu include. Will need to play 
>> with it a bit.
> 
> Sure, that makes sense. Let me know when you are done and I'll play with the 
> css a bit. It is a bit ugly right now.
> 
> 
> Ari
> 
> 
> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 1:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 31/10/12 7:24am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Note that second and third templates do not extend skeleton template, as 
>>>> they are essentially incompatible. I just committed the changes, and here 
>>>> are the rendered examples:
>>>> 
>>>> http://cayenne.staging.apache.org/download.html
>>>> http://cayenne.staging.apache.org/doc30/api/index.html
>>>> http://cayenne.staging.apache.org/doc30/overview.html
>>> 
>>> Why can't the third template extend skeleton? I tried to strip out the bits 
>>> of the html from the Confluence export which were incompatible, leaving 
>>> only (hopefully) compatible bits. Perhaps we can put back skeleton and 
>>> tweak the css a little to cope?
>>> 
>>> I think the next steps are just news and tying in the automated 
>>> docbook/javadoc builds for trunk documentation.
>>> 
>>> If we go down the Apache Blog approach for news, this is what we do:
>>> 
>>> {% for e in blog.list %}
>>>      <h2><a href="{{ e.url }}">{{ e.title }}</a></h2>
>>>      <div class="section-content">{{ e.content|safe|truncatewords_html:355 
>>> }}</div>
>>>      <hr>
>>>    {% endfor %}
>>> 
>>> in our path.pm file:
>>> 
>>> [ qr!^/index\.mdtext$!, news_page => {
>>>         blog     => ASF::Value::Blogs->new(blog => "cayenne", limit=> 4),
>>> } ],
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Pluses:
>>> 
>>> * people can add comments to the posts
>>> * we get broader publicity on the main apache site as well with no extra 
>>> effort
>>> * there is probably an rss feed
>>> 
>>> Minuses:
>>> 
>>> * I don't know if we can carry forward historical news, so we'd need to 
>>> handle that separately
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Andrus, would you like to give this a try since you now have a local 
>>> environment? I can then style up the news items. Later on if we get really 
>>> clever it seems we might be able to have a feed on the side of recent Jira 
>>> comments and svn commits. That would be nice to show the activity that 
>>> happens behind the scenes.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ari
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -------------------------->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> 

Reply via email to