Sure. I'll rename 3_1 to 3.1. Makes sense. Regarding older docs… Let me play with .htaccess. I think we can move those too.
Again, now that we have possibilities not available when we used Confluence, organizing everything the way it "should" be is certainly a good idea. Andrus On Nov 8, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/11/12 6:56pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> I didn't touch 1.2, 2.0, 3.0 layout. So no need for redirects. I strongly >> support the notion that we shouldn't be changing the existing >> well-publicized URLs without a cause. And if we do, always provide a 301 >> redirect (see "content/.htaccess"). But this is not the case here. >> >> The new scheme starts with 3.1 release. Among other things the new CMS freed >> us from the directory and file naming imposed by Confluence Autoexport, so I >> figured the URLs might follow the menu hierarchy for the docs. Also >> "unflattening" the top directory structure seems like a good thing for our >> own sanity. > > Personally I don't know it is more sane (although I hate underscores). But I > think we *want* consistency. That is, if I'm looking at > > http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/3.0/something > > I'd like to be able to change the url to > > http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/2.0/something > > and have it work. > > > > Ari > > > -- > --------------------------> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >
