We already have a bunch of deps like JGroups that are excluded via the ugly cayenne-server/cayenne-client hack. Need a cleaner solution to include integrations. I am wondering if we should play with "optional" Maven dependency scope for such things.
Otherwise I am open to including Joda (and then later its JDK analog). Andrus On Dec 16, 2012, at 3:55 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/12/12 10:06am, John Huss wrote: >> Any thoughts on supporting joda time? Would this be better if placed a >> third party jar to avoid adding a new dependency? Or is it something >> you're interested in adding to the core? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1626 > > > I definitely don't think that it should go into the core, especially since > the successor to Joda is scheduled to land in Java 8 (I hope!). > > https://github.com/ThreeTen/threeten > > Ari > > > > > -- > --------------------------> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >
