Good point. Our only physical limitation is the PMC capacity to evaluate and 
vote on the releases. I guess let's do them one by one and see how that goes.

A.

On Jun 26, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote:
> No one I know will use 3.1 until it is 3.1 Final (or even 3.1.1) ... so I
> think a 3.0.3 for those people would make a little sense and make that the
> final release.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Andrus Adamchik 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> I could care less about 3.0.3, but maybe other people do?
>> 
>> +1 for 3.1RC1
>> 
>> On Jun 26, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Andrus,
>>> 
>>> Since you are talking about 3.2M1, should we also consider a 3.0.3 (maybe
>>> make that a final release barring critical bugs) and a 3.1B3 (or maybe
>> RC1)?
>>> 
>>> mrg
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to