Hi Mike, On Aug 30, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it is directly referenced by our tests, It is. > then I would say we should > not have this as a dependency, since any code that references it is > now polluted by the viral nature of LGPL. Ok. I guess we’ll need to find a replacement. Andrus
