Hmm.. IIRC there was a bug in 3.1 that would ignore bound SchemaUpdateStrategy.
Don't remember the details, but it messed up my tests before.
Andrus
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 3:43 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> I haven't watched GoT yet, so no spoilers! :-)
>
> Around 7:30 you make it look like you can't do something without messing
> with XML in 3.1, but in fact, I did:
>
> /**
>
> * Sets up JNDI, Cayenne, Database, and Tapestry Registry for all tests.
>
> */
>
> @BeforeClass
>
> public static void setUpAllTests() throws NamingException
>
> {
>
> ...
>
> // Use a custom Cayenne server runtime.
>
> CayenneUtils.setCayenneRuntime(new ServerRuntime(Analytic.MODEL_NAME,
> new CayenneExtrasModule()));
>
> ...
>
> }
>
>
> /**
>
> * Custom Cayenne DI module.
>
> */
>
> private static class CayenneExtrasModule implements Module
>
> {
>
> @Override
>
> public void configure(Binder binder)
>
> {
>
> // Change the SchemaUpdateStrategy to create the DB schema for
> unit
>
> // testing instead of using the model's default which assumes an
>
> // existing schema.
>
> binder.bind(SchemaUpdateStrategy.class
> ).to(CreateIfNoSchemaStrategy.class);
>
> }
>
> }
>
> Still watching the rest, but +1 for adding it to the site!
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSauEmPnkCU
>>
>> I just uploaded to YouTube a video with my talk about new features in
>> Cayenne 4.0. This was given at WOWODC in April. It is not as exciting as
>> Game of Thrones :) , but what's the community opinion on embedding it on
>> our home page?
>>
>> Andrus
