Just updated MySQL Docker profile. Now it works fine and all tests pass.

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com
> wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> I've run tests on Postgres and here what I've found.
>
> All failures of MergeCase.setUp: as I thought problem is with new
> DataMapMerger (ex DbMerger): Postgres DB doesn't distinct DECIMAL and
> NUMERIC data types
> and fields like SOME_DECIMAL_FIELD DECIMAL(10, 2) end up as NUMERIC(10, 2)
> type. And new merger try to fix types mismatch thus generating MergerToken
> that shouldn't be there.
>
> Other failures is a result of DbLoader refactoring and after a quick look
> at them I think their cause is that Postgres store all names in lowercase
> (as opposite to almost all other DBs that store them in uppercase).
> Hope to commit fixes soon. And clearly I need to run tests against Oracle
> and SQLServer as there can be yet unknown problems too.
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Savva Kolbachev <s.kolbac...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I've added docker profiles for dbsync module. So now it works for both
> > mysql and postgres, but there are a lot of failed tests for postgres in
> > this module.
> >
> > Failed tests:
> > AttributeLoaderIT.testAttributeLoad:46 null
> > DbLoaderIT.testSimpleLoad:82 null
> > ExportedKeyLoaderIT.testExportedKeyLoad:63 expected:<2> but was:<0>
> > PrimaryKeyLoaderIT.testPrimaryKeyLoad:52 null
> > SetAllowNullToDbIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > SetNotNullToDbIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > SetPrimaryKeyToDbIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > ValueForNullIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> assertTokensAndExecute:216->
> > MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > DropRelationshipToModelIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > AddColumnToModelIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > CreateTableToModelIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > DropTableToModelIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > DropColumnToModelIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > DropColumnToModelIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > EntityMergeSupportIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> > assertTokensAndExecute:216->MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > MergerFactoryIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> assertTokensAndExecute:216->
> > MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > MergerFactoryIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> assertTokensAndExecute:216->
> > MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > MergerFactoryIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> assertTokensAndExecute:216->
> > MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > MergerFactoryIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> assertTokensAndExecute:216->
> > MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > MergerFactoryIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> assertTokensAndExecute:216->
> > MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> > MergerFactoryIT>MergeCase.setUp:99->MergeCase.
> assertTokensAndExecute:216->
> > MergeCase.assertTokens:210
> > tokens to db expected:<0> but was:<1>
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Savva Kolbachev <s.kolbac...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > It didn't work on MacOS
> > > It's known issue [1] that I thought we had discussed here [2] and
> > private.
> > > Anyway, it works fine on Linux.
> > >
> > > > MySQL failures are all expected - the exact same set we saw during
> > > release testing.
> > > IIRC, it could be easily fixed by setting db charset to utf8 general_ci
> > >
> > > > PostgreSQL failures are all new. Not sure what's up with those?
> > > My experience tell me that there is a problem in configuration. Also,
> we
> > > should be sure that driver is set correctly. I'll check it localy.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/fabric8io/docker-maven-plugin/issues/430
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/cayenne/pull/111#issuecomment-248336617
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> and...@objectstyle.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> So I merged Travis/Docker support PR by @IRus [1].
> > >>
> > >> It didn't work on MacOS:
> > >>
> > >> [INFO] --- docker-maven-plugin:0.15.6:start (start-postgres) @
> > >> cayenne-server ---
> > >> [INFO] DOCKER> [postgres:9.5] "db": Start container bb8f98855916
> > >> [INFO] DOCKER> [postgres:9.5] "db": Waiting for ports [5432] directly
> on
> > >> container with IP (172.17.0.2).
> > >> [ERROR] DOCKER> [postgres:9.5] "db": Timeout after 30229 ms while
> > waiting
> > >> on tcp port '[/172.17.0.2:5432]'
> > >> [ERROR] DOCKER> Error occurred during container startup, shutting
> > down...
> > >>
> > >> Could be something configuration-related, as container startup was
> > >> actually successful. The tests just could not figure out correct
> network
> > >> connection. Need to debug this some more.
> > >>
> > >> It also failed on Travis [2]. But there are more reasons for optimism.
> > >> All the failures are unit test failures that can either be fixed or
> > >> disabled conditionally. The Docker setup itself works correctly, and
> > this
> > >> is a big step forward. MySQL failures are all expected - the exact
> same
> > set
> > >> we saw during release testing. PostgreSQL failures are all new. Not
> sure
> > >> what's up with those?
> > >>
> > >> I disabled these 2 profiles on Travis for now. Should be easy to add
> > them
> > >> back [3].
> > >>
> > >> Andrus
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cayenne/pull/152
> > >> [2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds/184759909
> > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/cayenne/commit/544375feb3f54921e0f
> > >> 74cc1744585d2b6117689#diff-354f30a63fb0907d4ad57269548329e3
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Savva Kolbachev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Savva Kolbachev
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Nikita Timofeev
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Savva Kolbachev

Reply via email to