On 7/6/17 12:19 AM, Nikita Timofeev wrote:
> I've run some additional benchmarks for field-based classes inspired
> by John and they were so promising, that I've moved on
> to the implementation.
> 
> So here is pull request for you to review [1].
> Here [2] you can see what new generated classes will look like.

Nice work. Seems so obvious in hindsight. But all good ideas do.

* Does this make debugging memory with a profiler easier since it makes it 
simpler to identify field usage?

* What is the impact on ROP?

* Would we want this to be an option for users or is there just no upside to 
the Map implementation?


Ari


-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Reply via email to