On 7/6/17 12:19 AM, Nikita Timofeev wrote: > I've run some additional benchmarks for field-based classes inspired > by John and they were so promising, that I've moved on > to the implementation. > > So here is pull request for you to review [1]. > Here [2] you can see what new generated classes will look like.
Nice work. Seems so obvious in hindsight. But all good ideas do. * Does this make debugging memory with a profiler easier since it makes it simpler to identify field usage? * What is the impact on ROP? * Would we want this to be an option for users or is there just no upside to the Map implementation? Ari -- --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A