+1 On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 4:26 AM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Changing the iconography and removing the color both at the same time > made > > the modeler so much harder to use. > > > I don't have such a strong feeling about this, but I still agree with > Tony. I had the same exact experience after the upgrade. And even after > months on the new Modeler, I always have to pause when locating the "Edit" > button to not hit "Remove" by mistake (and vice versa). > > > Color is a significant indicator and I really think you should rethink > the > > idea of toning it down so completely. > > +1. Just like we went back and added color to the model nodes, I suggest > we try and re-add color to the icons. > > Andrus > > > > On Aug 19, 2017, at 12:06 PM, Tony Giaccone <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Started using Cayenne 4.0 Modeler, and let me just give a few thoughts. > > > > Positives: > > > > The UI functionally is an improvement. A number of the things that used > to > > annoy me are now fixed. Retention of Datasource, for example. The Modeler > > feels snappier, more responsive. > > > > Negatives: > > > > Changing the iconography and removing the color both at the same time > made > > the modeler so much harder to use. Muted colors, mean you lose the > feedback > > that could provide you with reassurance your making the right choice. > Wow, > > I can't say this enough. Toning down the color of elements in the UI > makes > > it so much harder to use. This overwhelmed all the other positives and > made > > the Modeler using the Modeler unpleasant. I found myself spending a lot > > more time waiting for the labels that hover if you linger on an item, to > be > > certain I was doing the right thing. Over time I guess this will get > > better, but as an overall change, I can't say how much I dislike this. > > > > Color is a significant indicator and I really think you should rethink > the > > idea of toning it down so completely. > > > > > > Tony Giaccone > >
