> Am 25.09.2018 um 16:59 schrieb John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com>: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:50 AM Maik Musall <m...@selbstdenker.ag > <mailto:m...@selbstdenker.ag>> wrote: > >> >> >>> Am 25.09.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>: >>> >>>> "Should Cayenne by default work without prefixed accessors". >>> >>> >>> So how about this... Unless someone else steps in by then, let me >> brainstorm it with Nikita a couple of weeks from now and see if we can do a >> DI solution. It is not nearly as involved as it appears. >> >> I would be very happy about that! :) >> >> And once that's there, one way to implement a BeanAccessor alternative >> could perhaps be one that is tailored towards field-based DataObjects, >> accessing the fields directly without using reflection? If possible, that >> could present another noticable performance win. >> > > FWIW, I would consider this a non-goal since it would bypass the getter > method which may have custom logic (like returning a default value or > something).
I didn't mean this to become a standard way, but once the DI point is there, it's easy to rock your own implementation if you know it matches your use case. Maik
